Clinical experience of skin regeneration in the treatment of deep second-degree facial burn
皮肤再生医疗技术治疗颜面部深Ⅱ度烧伤临床体会

摘要

目的 本研究旨在评估皮肤再生医疗技术在治疗颜面部深Ⅱ度烧伤中的临床效果，并与传统治疗方法进行对比。方法 我们招募了100名颜面部深Ⅱ度烧伤患者，其中50名患者接受皮肤再生医疗技术治疗（治疗组），另外50名患者接受传统治疗方法（对照组）。比较两组患者的基本信息、创面愈合时间、创面感染发生率、创面瘢痕评分和功能恢复情况等指标。结果 治疗组和对照组在性别、年龄、烧伤面积和烧伤原因等基本信息上相似。然而，治疗组表现出更短的创面愈合时间（18.3天 vs. 24.6天），较低的创面感染发生率（8% vs. 24%），更低的创面瘢痕评分（3.2 vs. 5.7），以及更好的功能恢复情况，包括面部表情、口腔功能、咀嚼和吞咽以及视觉功能。这些结果表明皮肤再生医疗技术在颜面部深Ⅱ度烧伤中具有显著的临床效果。结论 本研究结果表明皮肤再生医疗技术在颜面部深Ⅱ度烧伤的治疗中具有明显优势。它能够加速创面愈合，减少创面感染发生，改善瘢痕情况，并促进功能的恢复。因此，皮肤再生医疗技术有望成为颜面部深Ⅱ度烧伤患者的有效治疗选择。进一步的研究和临床实践将有助于验证这一技术的安全性和可行性，并推动其在临床应用中的进一步发展和应用。

Abstract

Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical effect of skin regeneration in the treatment of deep ⅱdegree facial burn and compare it with traditional treatment.
Methods We recruited 100 patients with deep second-degree facial burns, 50 of whom received skin regeneration therapy (treatment group) and 50 of whom received traditional treatment (control group). The basic information, wound healing time, wound infection rate, wound scar score and functional recovery were compared between the two groups.
Results The basic information of gender, age, burn area and burn cause were similar between the treatment group and the control group. However, the treatment group showed a shorter wound healing time (18.3 days vs. 24.6 days), a lower incidence of wound infection (8% vs. 24%), a lower wound scar score (3.2 vs. 5.7), and better functional recovery, including facial expression, oral function, chewing and swallowing, and visual function. These results indicate that the skin regeneration technique has a significant clinical effect on deep second-degree burns on the face.
Conclusion   The results of this study indicate that skin regeneration technology has obvious advantages in the treatment of deep second-degree burns on the face. It can accelerate wound healing, reduce wound infection, improve scar conditions, and promote functional recovery. Therefore, skin regeneration medical technology is expected to be an effective treatment option for patients with deep second-degree burns on the face. Further research and clinical practice will help verify the safety and feasibility of this technology and promote its further development and application in clinical applications.