Open Access Article
International Journal of Surgical Research. 2022; 5: (1) ; 9-12 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.ijsr.20220003.
Control of inflammatory cytokines and clinical efficacy analysis of disposable VSD negative pressure drainage technique in skin defects, bone defects and traumatic infections of extremities
一次性VSD负压引流技术在四肢皮肤缺损、骨缺损及创面感染对炎症细胞因子的控制及临床疗效分析
作者:
陈银杰 *,
娄冰,
温达高,
谢代刚,
梁剑波
佛山市第五人民医院 广东佛山
*通讯作者:
陈银杰,单位:佛山市第五人民医院 广东佛山;
发布时间: 2022-06-24 总浏览量: 413
PDF 全文下载
引用本文
万方数据(WANFANG DATA)
摘要
目的 观察四肢皮肤缺损、骨缺损及感染患者使用一次性负压引流技术(Vacuum Sealing Draina VSD)治疗对炎症细胞因子控制及临床的疗效分析。方法 将2021年1月-2021年10月收治的10例四肢皮肤缺损、骨缺损及感染创面患者,随机分组分为治疗组与对照组,每组各5例,分别采用一次性VSD负压引流技术治疗、常规换药治疗后再次手术治疗的对比效果。结果 5例接受一次性VSD负压引流技术治疗炎症细胞因子控制时间需5.0±2.3天,创面愈合需18±2.5天,功能康复需28±5.5天;5例接受常规换药治疗炎症细胞因子控制时间需14.1±3.0天,创面愈合需35±4.2天,功能康复需53±8.1天。对两组创面细胞炎症因子控制时间、创面愈合时间、功能康复时间,治疗组效率高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 一次性负压VSD引流技术无论在炎症细胞因子控制、创面愈合时间、功能康复更具优势,有助于患者尽快恢复,提升患者的生活质量,值得推荐。
关键词: 皮肤;骨缺损及创面感染;VSD;炎症细胞因子控制;治疗效果
Abstract
Objective To observe the control of inflammatory cytokines and clinical efficacy analysis of treatment with disposable negative pressure drainage technique (Vacuum Sealing Draina VSD) in patients with skin defects, bone defects and infections of extremities. Methods Ten patients with skin defects, bone defects and infected wounds of the extremities admitted from January 2021 to October 2021 were randomly grouped into a treatment group and a control group, with 5 cases in each group, to compare the effects of treatment with disposable VSD negative pressure drainage technique, conventional drug exchange treatment followed by reoperation, respectively. Results The inflammatory cytokine control time of 5.0±2.3 days, wound healing time of 18±2.5 days, and functional recovery time of 28±5.5 days for 5 cases treated with disposable VSD negative pressure drainage technique, and the inflammatory cytokine control time of 14.1±3.0 days, wound healing time of 35±4.2 days, and functional recovery time of 53±8.1 days for 5 cases treated with conventional drug exchange. The efficiency of the treatment group was higher than that of the control group (P<0.05) with respect to the time of inflammatory cytokine control, trauma healing, and functional rehabilitation of the trauma cells in both groups. Conclusion Disposable negative pressure VSD drainage technique is more advantageous in both inflammatory cytokine control, trauma healing time, and functional recovery, which helps patients recover as soon as possible and improves their quality of life, and is recommended.
Key words: Skin; bone defect and trauma infection; VSD; inflammatory cytokine control; treatment effect
参考文献 References
[1] 马丹,刘敏,马兵,许雪峰,李晨阳,张萍,彭杨. VSD在5•12地震伤员下肢挤压伤后骨筋膜间隙综合征中的应用[J]. 重庆医学,2009,38(02):150-151.
[2] 张宇,姚元章,孙士锦,张连阳,付祥林,李英才,张敏. 反植皮法联合负压封闭引流技术治疗严重创伤合并大面积皮肤撕脱伤42例[J]. 第三军医大学学报,2008(14): 1389-1390.
[3] 姚元章,黄显凯,麻晓林,蒋耀光,周健,沈岳,庞典付,解光艾. 负压封闭技术治疗创伤后软组织缺损[J]. 创伤外科杂志,2002(01):9-12.
[4] 李慧璇. 负压封闭引流装置(VSD)在皮肤软组织缺损中的临床应用[D].新疆医科大学,2021.
[5] 汤苏阳,陈绍宗,胡昭华,宋梅,曹大勇,吕晓星. 封闭式负压引流技术对大鼠创面愈合过程中VEGF和BCL-2的影响[J]. 中国美容医学,2003(02):134-135.
[6] 汤苏阳,徐获荣,齐连军,郭月丽,纪慧茹. 封闭式负压引流技术对失神经支配创面愈合过程中血管生成的影响[J]. 中国临床康复,2005(46):91-93.
[7] 荆金忠,刘红,李敏,苑庆勇,李靖,陈绍宗,李学拥,许龙顺,李望舟,程飙. 封闭负压引流技术对创面微循环流速和血管口径影响的实验研究[J]. 现代康复,2000(12): 1848-1849.
[8] 陈绍宗. 封闭负压引流技术对创面微循环影响的实验研究[A]. 中华医学会烧伤外科学分会.中华医学会第六届全国烧伤外科学术会议论文汇编[C].中华医学会烧伤外科学分会,2001:3.
引用本文
陈银杰, 娄冰, 温达高, 谢代刚, 梁剑波, 一次性VSD负压引流技术在四肢皮肤缺损、骨缺损及创面感染对炎症细胞因子的控制及临床疗效分析[J]. 国际外科研究杂志, 2022; 5: (1) : 9-12.