期刊目次

加入编委

期刊订阅

添加您的邮件地址以接收即将发行期刊数据:

Open Access Article

International Journal of Surgical Research. 2022; 5: (1) ; 79-81 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.ijsr.20220024.

Application of high quality nursing in minimally invasive treatment of common bile duct stones
优质护理在微创治疗胆总管结石中的应用

作者: 杨磊 *

长沙市第一医院 湖南长沙

*通讯作者: 杨磊,单位:长沙市第一医院 湖南长沙;

发布时间: 2022-06-24 总浏览量: 371

摘要

目的 优质护理在微创治疗胆总管结石中的应用。方法 实验于2020年1月-2022年1月期间选择90例因胆总管结石前来我院进行就诊的病人进行调研,参与本次调研病人均接受微创治疗,在治疗过程中搭配护理干预。按照护理举措进行分组,每组均纳入45例病人。按照护理方式将其命名为常规组与研究组。常规组所采用的护理方案为传统常规护理,研究组则采用优质护理。总结与探究2种护理方案实施效果。结果 常规组并发症发生率为20%明显高于研究组的2.22%,两组对照差异明显,(P<0.05)。结论 在胆总管结石微创治疗中,配合优质护理,可提高护理质量,降低并发症发生率,此方案值得临床应用与普及。

关键词: 优质护理;微创治疗;胆总管结石

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the application of high quality nursing in minimally invasive treatment of common bile duct stones.
Methods from January 2020 to January 2022, the experiment selected 90 patients who came to our hospital for treatment due to common bile duct stones for investigation. All patients participating in this investigation received minimally invasive treatment and nursing intervention in the treatment process. According to the nursing measures, 45 patients were included in each group. They were named as routine group and study group according to the way of nursing. The nursing scheme adopted by the routine group was traditional routine nursing, while the study group adopted high-quality nursing. Summarize and explore the implementation effect of two nursing schemes.
Results Before nursing, the comparison of negative emotions between the two groups was p > 0.05. After nursing, the negative emotion score of the experimental group was better than that of the control group (P < 0.05). Before nursing, the comparison between the two pain groups (P > 0.05). After nursing, the pain score of the experimental group was better than that of the control group (P < 0.05). The incidence of complications in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05).
Conclusion   the incidence of complications in the routine group was 20%, which was significantly higher than 2.22% in the study group. There was significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05).

Key words: high quality nursing; Minimally invasive treatment; Choledocholithiasis

参考文献 References

[1] 霍露静,周东海.对胆总管结石患者行胆道镜微创保胆取石术后给予全方位护理的效果分析[J].系统医学,2021, 6(5):189-191.DOI:10.19368/j.cnki.2096-1782.2021.05.189.

[2] 颜桂兰,李国祥,苟欣,等. 优质护理在微创治疗胆总管结石中的应用[J].护士进修杂志,2012,27(3):281-282.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6975.2012.03.042.

[3] 庆华. 优质护理在微创治疗胆总管结石中的应用效果观察[J]. 世界最新医学信息文摘(连续型电子期刊), 2019,19(23):238-239.DOI:10.19613/j.cnki.1671-3141. 2019.23.159.

[4] 王东琴.内镜下微创治疗胆总管结石的围手术期护理[J].贵阳中医学院学报,2014,36(3):122-124.DOI:10.3969 /j.issn.1002-1108.2014.03.061.

[5] 邹月慧. 优质护理在微创治疗胆总管结石中的应用研究[J].当代医学,2017,23(27):157-158.DOI:10.3969/ j.issn. 1009-4393.2017.27.073.

[6] 黄亚楠.优质护理在胆总管结石患者微创治疗中的应用分析[J].医学理论与实践,2017,30(16):2459-2460. DOI: 10.19381/j.issn.1001-7585.2017.16.068.

[7] 王艳辉.优质护理在微创治疗胆总管结石中的应用价值[J].医疗装备,2017,30(11):141-142. DOI:10.3969/j.issn. 1002-2376.2017.11.095.

引用本文

杨磊, 优质护理在微创治疗胆总管结石中的应用[J]. 国际外科研究杂志, 2022; 5: (1) : 79-81.