Open Access Article
International Journal of Surgical Research. 2022; 5: (2) ; 17-20 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.ijsr.20220045.
Clinical comparative study of different blood purification modes in the treatment of patientswith end-stage renal disease
不同血液净化模式治疗终末期肾病患者的临床对比研究
作者:
刘文佳 *
自贡市第一人民医院 四川自贡
*通讯作者:
刘文佳,单位:自贡市第一人民医院 四川自贡;
发布时间: 2022-08-12 总浏览量: 346
PDF 全文下载
引用本文
万方数据(WANFANG DATA)
摘要
目的 分析不同血液净化模式治疗终末期肾病患者的临床效果。方法 将我院2020年1月-2021年12月96例终末期肾病患者,双盲随机法分二组。对照组给予常规血液透析,实验组实施高通量血液透析。比较两组治疗前后甲状旁腺素水平、血磷水平、血尿素氮、血肌酐水平、β-2微球蛋白、炎症应激水平、感染、失衡综合征、皮肤瘙痒等并发症发生率。结果 治疗前两组甲状旁腺素水平、血磷水平、血尿素氮、血肌酐水平、β-2微球蛋白、炎症应激水平比较,P>0.05,治疗后两组甲状旁腺素水平、血磷水平、血尿素氮、血肌酐水平、β-2微球蛋白、炎症应激水平均显著降低,而其中实验组甲状旁腺素水平、血磷水平、β-2微球蛋白、炎症应激水平显著低于对照组,P<0.05。而血尿素氮、血肌酐水平和对照组无显著差异,P>0.05。结论 终末期肾病患者实施高通量血液透析效果确切,可进一步提高透析充分性,更好清除β-2微球蛋白和甲状旁腺素,且可更好控制机体的炎症应激水平,减少并发症发生。
关键词: 不同血液净化模式;终末期肾病患者;临床效果
Abstract
Objective To analyze the clinical effect of different blood purification modes in the treatment of patients with end-stage renal disease. Methods 96 patients with end-stage renal disease in our hospital from January 2020 to December 2021 were divided into two groups by double-blind random method. The control group was given conventional hemodialysis, and the experimental group was given high-flux hemodialysis. The levels of parathyroid hormone, blood phosphorus, blood urea nitrogen, blood creatinine, β-2 microglobulin, inflammatory stress level, infection, imbalance syndrome, skin itching and other complications were compared between the two groups before and after treatment. Results The levels of parathyroid hormone, blood phosphorus, blood urea nitrogen, serum creatinine, β-2 microglobulin, and inflammatory stress levels were compared between the two groups before treatment, P>0.05. The levels of serum phosphorus, blood urea nitrogen, serum creatinine, β-2 microglobulin, and inflammatory stress were significantly decreased, while the levels of parathyroid hormone, blood phosphate, β-2 microglobulin, and inflammatory stress in the experimental group were significantly reduced. The stimulation level was significantly lower than that of the control group, P<0.05. The blood urea nitrogen and serum creatinine levels were not significantly different from the control group, P>0.05. Conclusion The effect of high flux hemodialysis in patients with end-stage renal disease is accurate, which can further improve dialysis adequacy, better clear β-2 microglobulin and parathyroid hormone, and can better control the level of inflammatory stress in the body and reduce complications disease occurs.
Key words: Different blood purification modes; End-stage renal disease patients; Clinical effect
参考文献 References
[1] 赵智伟,邵国建. 高通量血液透析疗法对终末期肾病透析充分性和患者营养状况的改善效果[J]. 中国疗养医学,2022,31(06):645-648.
[2] 孙京华,蒋甘孺,李胜开. 探讨杂合型血液净化运用于老年终末期肾病患者的临床效果[J]. 世界复合医学,2021,7(07):126-129+155.
[3] 米爱红,高瑞瑞,戴毅,王晓娜,刘晓,夏迎娟. 归因训练对接受血液净化治疗的终末期肾病患者主观幸福感和负性情绪的影响[J]. 临床研究,2021,29(06):152-154.
[4] 王慧. 终末期肾病患者透析前自体动静脉内瘘管理方案的构建[D].南京大学,2021.
[5] 周玉存. 对比不同血液净化方式治疗终末期糖尿病肾病的疗效以及对微炎症状态、血清甲状旁腺激素的影响效果[J]. 中国实用医药,2021,16(11):72-74.
[6] 于慧颖,何欢. 不同血液净化模式治疗终末期肾病患者的临床对比研究[J]. 血栓与止血学,2021,27(02):291-293.
[7] 吕长鑫. 不同血液净化方式对终末期肾病炎症因子及BUN、PTH、β2-MG水平的影响[J]. 临床研究,2020,28(12):50-51.
[8] 朱江浩. 不同血液净化模式对终末期糖尿病肾病患者胰岛素抵抗及微炎症状态的影响[J]. 中国现代药物应用,2020,14(14):53-55.
[9] 文澍. 向死而生:终末期肾病患者的疾痛叙事和意义赋予[D].湖南师范大学,2020.
[10] 张小梅,郑玉婷,王爱萍. 基于Neuman理论的护理模式对终末期肾病血液净化患者的影响[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志,2020,26(09):102-105.
[11] 徐晓满. 不同血液净化方法治疗终末期肾病的疗效分析[J]. 临床医药文献电子杂志,2020,7(34):79-96.
[12] 李斌. 不同血液净化方法治疗终末期肾病的临床效果及患者不良反应率分析[J]. 按摩与康复医学,2020,11(08):53-54.
引用本文
刘文佳, 不同血液净化模式治疗终末期肾病患者的临床对比研究[J]. 国际外科研究杂志, 2022; 5: (2) : 17-20.